The principles related to a state imposing restrictions upon the mubah (permissible acts)
This article is based on an excerpt from the book Al-Hakimiyah Wa Siyadah Ash-Shar’i, by Professor Muḥammad al-Mass’ari produced by the Renascence Foundation. It has become widespread among the masses[1] that the state is permitted to “Prevent and compel in the mubah” (المَنْع وَ الإِلْزام بِالمُباح), due to what some have called the public benefit (al-maslaha al-‘aamah). This understanding is based upon the premise that the shar’a has provided the legally responsible person (mukallaf) with a choice in performing or not performing the mubah. An erroneous view has arisen from this belief, which is the prohibition (tahreem) of what Allah and His Messenger have made halal, and obliging that which Allah ta’ala did not make obligatory, by compelling the subjects, and punishing them for their violations, without any clear shar’i restriction, or permission of Al-Shaari’ (the legislator) to do that. Allah ta’ala has rebuked the one who makes haram what He has made halal with the greatest rebuke, and has named the one who has done that from a legislative perspective as a mushrik. Allah …










