By Yasir Qadhi This is an extract from the lecture: Why Muslims Divide – The psychology of why the people closest to you are the hardest to tolerate A reality that transcends sectarianism is the competition for authority and legitimacy. This has been commented on and observed by many sociologists, including one of the most famous religious sociologists, Max Weber. If you know anything about the sociology of religion, you know Max Weber. Max Weber writes that the competition for religious authority is a struggle for legitimacy, i.e. to be legitimate you must have an affiliation to a person, or a movement or a group. Those movements or groups have markers of purity, status symbols. What makes them different? Whether the term is traditionalism and orthodoxy, whether it is the Salaf, whatever it might be, there is a mark of purity. There is a legitimacy that comes by attaching yourself to a group, an icon, a person. You are cleansed of any type of heresy by forming an attachment with this iconic figure that is revered …

By Yasir Qadhi This is an extract from the lecture: Why Muslims Divide – The psychology of why the people closest to you are the hardest to tolerate Cognitive dissonance amplification is most prominently championed by a very famous modern social psychologist of our times, Jonathan Haidt. He’s one of the most famous professors in this field of social psychology. Once again, he has written books and articles about this reality. He writes and I quote “the bitterest of conflicts are often amongst those who share the most similar beliefs.” This is a reality that we are all familiar with because who are you the most jealous of? Who do you find your problems are the most easy to amplify with? It’s your closest circle. You’re not jealous of Bill Gates, who has $50 billion, but if your cousin becomes a multi-millionaire, that’s where the jealousy will come. You’re not jealous of the most famous Hollywood actor, but if your friend becomes the life of the party, that’s where something happens. That’s the irony here. The …

By Yasir Qadhi This is an extract from the lecture: Why Muslims Divide – The psychology of why the people closest to you are the hardest to tolerate Social Identity Theory was most famously promoted by a Polish intellectual by the name of Henry Tajfel. Henry Tajfel, [a Holocaust survivor] was a Polish prisoner of war, captured by the Nazis. He thought he would lose his life and then eventually he was freed. He went on to do phenomenal, groundbreaking research in groupthink, researching how people do this [holocaust] to other people. World War II produced some amazing psychiatrists, sociologists and anthropologists who studied the banality of evil and how people can undertake such acts. Lots of books have been written about this. Henry Tajfel is one of these people that has gone through this reality as a young man. After he got out of the Nazi concentration camp, he went to London and became a well-known sociologist. He developed a theory that he called the theory of social identity. His theory is very similar to …

This is part of a series of articles on disunity and division within the Muslim community and ummah at large. This follows on from Dr. Yasir Qadhi’s lecture on ‘Why Muslims divide?’ Collective Action Human beings are not islands and no matter what activity they undertake, it will entail some form of collective action. Family, work and activism (daw’ah) are all collective actions. Even if an Islamic activist starts off with a solitary blog or podcast, in time, as it grows more and more popular, more resources and people will be required to keep it going. Some forms of activism may only require financial support by contributing through Patreon. Other types such as working within the community, education and mosques requires a more hands on grass roots approach. If we think ummatically, where we are one ummah made up of multiple groups all working within their specialist fields for the betterment of the deen then this is healthy and productive and will contribute to the revival of the Islamic civilization. This is also the sunnah …

By Yasir Qadhi This is an extract from the lecture: Why Muslims Divide – The psychology of why the people closest to you are the hardest to tolerate The second psychological and anthropological observed reality is called the narcissism of small differences. This is a well observed and documented phenomenon across all strands of movements, whether they are religious, whether they are social, whether they are political, it doesn’t matter. This can be summarized with the following statement: “Groups that are very similar exaggerate smaller differences to maintain their boundaries and identity.” I repeat, you can put it this way, the closer the groups are, the bigger their petty differences are exaggerated. This is an observable phenomenon observed by, as I said, by anthropologists, by psychiatrists, by anybody who’s observed large groups of people in whatever field. This is a phenomenon that transcends religion. In fact, not to justify, I’m just saying this, even Sigmund Freud has an entire chapter about this reality and he writes, not that I love Sigmund Freud, obviously that’s not …