The establishment of the first Muslim navy during the Caliphate of Uthman bin Affan, offers a fascinating insight in to what Muslims can achieve if they have a state, and the correct understanding of tawakkul (reliance on Allah) and the spheres of actions which are within and outside their control.
The early Islamic conquests have always perplexed western historians. How was it possible for the desert Arabs, who were viewed by the Persian and Byzantine empires as insignificant, posing no threat to them, to rise up and within a few years destroy their longstanding empires?
George Hourani, a maritime historian who has researched the early Muslim navy discusses “the problem of the earliest Arab ventures on the Mediterranean: how could they be successfully carried out in such a surprisingly short time?
The decisive event is the battle of Dhaat al-Sawaari (Battle of the Masts). To fight a naval battle, many resources were required: naval bases, including docks, shipbuilding yards, building materials and skilled shipbuilders; [and] warships with their complements of trained sailors, marines and officers.”
The power of Islam is derived from its aqeeda (belief) which forms the intellectual basis upon which all thoughts, actions and systems are based. This aqeeda motivated the early and later Muslims to accomplish astonishing feats, especially with regards to the Islamic conquests. When studying these events however, many focus solely on the strength of the sahaba’s iman or supernatural events such as the angels of Badr, while neglecting other actions they undertook to achieve their victories. This results in many important lessons being missed which we can learn from and follow today.
David Nicolle, a military historian who wrote a book studying the Battle of Yarmouk says: “It is also difficult to separate fact from pious myth. Today, however, the ‘pendulum of credibility’ has swung back from the almost total disbelief of early 20th century Western historians to what might be described as a ‘twilight’ of historical reality.”  He then discusses the military tactics used by General Khalid ibn Walid, and the Muslim army which helped achieve this decisive victory.
This article will discuss the establishment and development of the first Islamic navy, and the factors which enabled its success.
Pre-Islamic Arabia and the sea
In the seventh century, at the time Islam was revealed, the Arab tribes had no seafaring experience and had no need for ships, because Quraysh had a well-established land route from Yemen to Syria. This camel route brought caravans of goods from the Indian Ocean via the port of Aden to the Byzantines in Ash-Sham. As mentioned by Montgomery Watt, the Quraysh “were prosperous merchants who had obtained something like a monopoly of the trade between the Indian Ocean and East Africa on the one hand and the Mediterranean on the other.”
Securing these caravans was of utmost importance to Quraysh, so they established a network of tribal alliances all along the camel route which not only provided security from highway robbers, but also rest stops for the camels and merchants. This was seen as a far safer route than the potentially hazardous conditions a merchant ship could fall into on the Red Sea. Hourani mentions this; “Rather than face the terrors of the Red Sea, the Arabs developed camel routes along the whole western side of their peninsula.” This lucrative trade made Quraysh very wealthy and it became a vital interest of theirs which they had to secure at all costs.
Allah (Most High) reminds Quraysh of this blessing He gave to them:
إِيلَافِهِمْ رِحْلَةَ الشِّتَاءِ وَالصَّيْفِ
فَلْيَعْبُدُوا رَبَّ هَٰذَا الْبَيْتِ
الَّذِي أَطْعَمَهُم مِّن جُوعٍ وَآمَنَهُم مِّنْ خَوْفٍ
“In acknowledgment of the established tradition of Quraysh, their tradition of the winter and summer caravans: so let them worship the Lord of this House who has preserved them from hunger and secured them from fear.” (Surah Quraysh)
This is not to say that the Arabs were unaware of the sea. Makkah was a trade hub not only for goods arriving on the caravans from Yemen and Ash-Sham, but also from merchant ships arriving from Abyssinia at the port of Shaybah near Jeddah. It was one of these ships which the early Muslims from Makkah boarded when fleeing Quraysh’s persecution, en-route to the Negus in Abyssinia. Hourani says, “But it appears that the Quraysh had no ships of their own, for they were unable to pursue the fleeing emigrants (Muslim migration to Abyssinia) onto the sea. They would rather wait for foreign ships to be wrecked on their shore; the wood of a wrecked Greek vessel was taken for use in the roof of their Ka’bah. The pre-Islamic poetry of the desert Arabs seldom contains more than a passing reference to the sea.”
Islam’s praise for Naval Expeditions
The most famous hadith on this subject is the prophecy narrated by Umm Haraam bint Milhan who was the maternal aunt of the Prophet Muhammad ﷺ. She accompanied the navy during its first campaign to Cyprus with her husband Ubadah ibn-As-Samit, where she subsequently died and is buried. This was foretold by the Messenger of Allah ﷺ.
One day the Messenger of Allah ﷺ entered the house of Umm Haraam, and she provided him with food and started grooming his head. Then the Messenger of Allah slept, and then he woke up smiling.
Umm Haraam asked, “What is making you smile, O Messenger of Allah?” He ﷺ said,
” نَاسٌ مِنْ أُمَّتِي يَرْكَبُونَ الْبَحْرَ الأَخْضَرَ فِي سَبِيلِ اللَّهِ، مَثَلُهُمْ مَثَلُ الْمُلُوكِ عَلَى الأَسِرَّةِ ”
“Some people of my ummah were shown to me (in my dream) campaigning for the sake of Allah, sailing on the green sea like kings on thrones.”
Umm Haram added, “I said, ‘O Messenger of Allah! Pray to Allah to make me one of them.”‘ So the Messenger of Allah ﷺ prayed to Allah for her and then laid his head down (and slept).
Then he woke up smiling (again). (Umm Haram added): I said, “What is making you smile, O Messenger of Allah?” He said, “Some people of my ummah were shown to me (in my dream) campaigning for the sake of Allah, “
He said the same as he had said before. I said, “O Messenger of Allah! Pray to Allah to make me one of them.” He said, “You will be among the first ones.”
Umm Haraam heard the Messenger of Allah ﷺ say:
أَوَّلُ جَيْشٍ مِنْ أُمَّتِي يَغْزُونَ الْبَحْرَ قَدْ أَوْجَبُوا
“(Paradise) is granted to the first batch of my followers who will undertake a naval expedition (ghazwa).” Umm Haraam said, “O Messenger of Allah am I among them?” He said “Yes you are.”
The Messenger of Allah ﷺ also said, “A Ghazwah on the sea is better than ten Ghazawaat (expeditions of battles) upon the land.”
Ibn-Nuhaas says: “The author of al Mughni (Ibn Qudamah Al-Maqdisee) and others from the school of Imam Ahmad state that the expeditions of the sea are greater in reward than those of land since it is more difficult and dangerous.”
Kaab al-Ahbar said: “When a man first sets his foot on the ship he leaves all his sins behind him and becomes clean like the day he was born. And the one who suffers seasickness is like the injured who is pouring his blood in the path of Allah. And the one who is patient in the sea is like a king with a crown on his head.”
Naval Expedition’s in the Caliphate of Umar ibn al-Khattab
The Byzantines had a well-established navy and had been seafarers since ancient times. This posed a major threat to the coastlines of the Islamic State most notably Alexandria in Egypt and other coastal ports on the Mediterranean in Ash-Sham. A new navy had to be established in order to confront this threat.
Mu’aawiya, the governor of Ash-Sham tried to convince the Caliph Umar ibn Al-Khattab to establish a navy, but Umar on the advice of Amr ibn Al-‘Aas refused because he didn’t want to risk the lives of the Muslim soldiers by fighting a battle with the well-established Byzantine Navy. Umar said, “No, by the One Who sent Muhammad with the truth, I will never let a Muslim campaign by sea. By Allah, a Muslim is dearer to me than all that the Byzantines have. Stop suggesting that to me.”
As mentioned previously the Arabs were not seafarers and had no naval experience. Therefore, the risk of naval warfare was too great for Umar so he refused Mu’aawiya’s request. As commander-in-chief Umar had the final say and Mu’aawiya was forced to abandon the idea, since all the army leadership is under the Caliph’s authority.
What enforced Umar’s opinion was the failed naval expedition of his governor of Bahrain, Al-Alaa al-Hadrami. The Muslim rulers of the past were not like those of today who are content to remain in their palaces while Muslims suffer under oppression all around them. The governors and caliphs of the past were eager to take Islam forward, which is why Al-Alaa al-Hadrami in his eagerness launched an unauthorised mission by sea to Fars in Persia.
Al-Alaa organised his army in to three corps to attack Fars. They departed Bahrain by ship and travelled across the Persian Gulf to present day Iran. The three corp commanders were:
- al-Jarud ibn Mu’alla
- al-Sawwar ibn Hammam
- Khulayd ibn al-Mundhir ibn Sawa
The first two corps were defeated, and the third led by Khulayd were cut off from their ships by the Persians leaving the army trapped in Fars.
‘Umar wrote to the governor of Basra, ‘Utbah bin Ghazwan and said, “Al-Ala’ al-Hadrami compelled an armed force of Muslims to go overseas. Consequently, the inhabitants of Fars cut them off from returning to their ships. Al-‘Ala’ has disobeyed me, I do not think he was seeking Allah’s approval with this. Moreover, if they do not get help, I fear that those men marooned in Fars will be defeated, cut off from help as they are. Therefore, before they are wiped out, send them reinforcements and, once rescued, place them under your supervision.”
The army escaped over land to Basra with the help of Utbah. Umar then dismissed Al-Alaa as governor of Bahrain and appointed him governor of Basra. However, Al-Alaa died before he reached Basra and was buried in Bahrain.
Note here that this expedition is not considered the first naval ghazwa mentioned in the hadith of Umm Haraam, because the Prophet ﷺ said she would be on the first mission which was that of the campaign to Cyprus.
Umar’s opposition to the use of ships was only limited to naval warfare where the lives of Muslims would be at risk.
During the famine in Hijaz, Amr bin al-Aas used boats to send food supplies by ship to the port of Al-Jarr near Medina.
Umar sent word to ‘Amr ibn al-‘As, his governor in Egypt, saying: “From the slave of Allah ‘Umar ibn al-Khattab, the Ameer al-Mu’mineen, to ‘Amr ibn al-‘As. Peace be upon you. Do you want me and those around me to die, whilst you and those around you are living a life of luxury? Help, help!”
‘Amr ibn al-‘As wrote back to him: “To the slave of Allah Ameer al-Mu ’mineen from ‘ Amr ibn al-‘As. Peace be upon you. I praise Allah, beside Whom there is no other god. Help is on its way, just wait. I am sending to you a caravan the first of which will reach you whilst the last of it is still with me. I also hope to find a way to send help by sea.”
‘Amr sent food supplies via the well-established camel route across the desert to Sinai, through Gaza and in to Hijaz, but he also managed to send some ships of corn via the newly dug Trajan’s Canal which linked the Nile to the Red Sea.
Uthman authorises the First Muslim Navy
When Uthman became Caliph, Mu’aawiya tried again to convince him of the necessity of establishing a navy. Uthman initially refused citing Umar’s opinion, but Mu’aawiya persisted and Uthman finally agreed when Mu’aawiya convinced him that the sea journey to Cyprus was not a risky venture. Uthman, however stipulated two conditions:
1- Mu’aawiya had to take his wife with him. If he thought it was safe for his wife, then it was safe for the other Muslims.
2- The sailors and marines had to volunteer for the campaign
First Naval Campaign to Cyprus 28AH/649CE
When Mu’aawiya received the letter from Uthman authorising him to establish a navy, he began mobilising the people for the campaign to Cyprus. He refurbished the sea port at Acre in Palestine as a launching point for the ships, and he ordered the people on the coast to repair their ships and bring them to the port.
As instructed Mu’aawiya brought his wife Fakhitah bint Qarzah along with him and one of his generals Ubadah ibn Samit brought his wife Umm Haraam bint Milhan as prophesised in the hadith. Although Mu’aawiya did not force anyone to accompany him, a huge force volunteered motivated by the hadith and love of conquest.
At the end of winter in 28AH/649CE the navy embarked from Acre towards Cyprus. When the Muslims landed on the Cyprus coast, Umm Haraam went to ride her mount, but the animal spooked and she fell to the ground, broke her neck and died.
The inhabitants of the island barricaded themselves in the capital Qustantina, awaiting reinforcements from the Byzantines which did not come, so they signed a peace treaty with Mu’aawiya. This treaty was not a full conquest of the island where Cyprus would come under the authority of the Islamic State. Rather it was an emergency treaty (Al-Mu’aahadaat Al-Idtiraariyyah) where the islanders would pay 7200 dinars a year in tax, inform the Muslims of the Byzantine movements and would not assist the Byzantines if they attacked the state.
Four years later in 32AH/653CE the Cypriots under intense pressure from the Byzantines broke the treaty and this time Mu’aawiya led a full conquest of the island which all came under the authority of the Islamic State. Abdullah ibn Sa’d brought his navy from Egypt to assist Mu’aawiya in this campaign.
For the first naval campaign to Cyprus, Mu’aawiya ordered the people on Ash-Sham’s coasts to repair their existing ships. These may have been abandoned by the Byzantines after Yarmouk, or they may have been fishing vessels fallen in to disrepair. However, for building the later ships which took part in the decisive Dhaat Al-Sawaari, and the subsequent conquests of the Mediterranean islands, we need to look to Egypt. Hourani mentions, “Alexandria was a complete naval base, having a splendid harbor, capacious shipyards and Coptic builders; Egypt has always been a country of skilled craftsmen, and no doubt the Copts had profited from Greek science of which Alexandria had been the center ever since its foundation. The only thing lacking was good timber, in which Egypt is poor; this had to be brought from Syria or elsewhere. The ports of Syria, principally Acre and Tyre, were also bases from which a part of the fleet left for Dhat al-Sawari. But at this date there was no shipbuilding on the Syrian coast…The fleet which fought the battle, then, must have been constructed entirely in Alexandria.”
When Amr bin Al-Aas conquered Egypt during the Caliphate of Umar ibn al-Khattab, he therefore had a ready-made naval base in Alexandria, and skilled shipbuilders from among the Coptic Christians who had become dhimmi, non-Muslim citizens of the Islamic State.
There were cordial relations between the Muslims and Copts since the first correspondence between the Prophet Muhammad ﷺ and Al-Muqawqis, head of the Copts, and Vicegerent of Egypt for the Byzantine Empire. After receiving the Prophet’s ﷺ letter, Al-Muqawqis kissed it and sent back his reply with some gifts – a ceremonial gown, a mule and saddle, and two slave girls, one of whom became Ibrahim’s mother. 
During the conquest of Egypt, the Muslims captured Al-Muqawqis’s daughter Armanoosah who was running away from a forced marriage to Constantine the son of Heraclius. Amr ibn Al-Aas, head of the campaign, gathered his advisors and reminded them of the words of Allah:
هَلْ جَزَاءُ الْإِحْسَانِ إِلَّا الْإِحْسَانُ
“Is there any reward for good other than good?” (Ar-Rahman, 55:60)
Then he said: “Al-Muqawqis sent a gift to our Prophet; I think we should return his daughter to him, and all of her servants and entourage whom we have captured, and their wealth that we seized.” They agreed to that. So ‘Amr sent her back to her father with honour; along with all her jewels and male and female slaves. Her servant Barbara said to her during the journey: “Oh my mistress, the Arabs are surrounding us on all sides.” Armanoosah said, “I feel that my life and my honour are safe among the tents of the Arabs, but I do not feel safe in the palace of my father.” When she reached her father, he was very pleased with her and the way that the Muslims had treated her.
Ubadah ibn as-Samit was sent to speak with Al-Muqawqis and offer him the three foreign policy options: accept Islam and become Muslim citizens, live as non-Muslim citizens (dhimmi) or fight. Al-Muqawqis didn’t want to lose his position and was unhappy about his people submitting to the Islamic authority, but after speaking with his advisors he agreed to sign a peace treaty (dhimma) with the Islamic State leading to the Copts becoming citizens of the state.
The Byzantines were still in Egypt and it wasn’t until 21AH/641CE after a long siege and subsequent battle, that Alexandria was finally conquered under the command of Ubadah ibn as-Samit.
Five years later in 25AH/646CE when Uthman was Caliph, some inhabitants of Alexandria wrote to Constantine, the son of Heraclius requesting he reconquer the city and offering him assistance in that. Constantine sent Manuel al-Khassa in command of a huge force carried on three hundred ships to reconquer Egypt.
The Byzantine army was not like the Muslim army who fight for seeking a spiritual value. The Byzantines were not interested in the welfare of the Egyptians, and instead fought for prestige and wealth. During their short campaign they ransacked Alexandria and left it in ruins, and began plundering the wealth of the Egyptians. This led the local inhabitants to regret their decision and so they supported the Muslims again and requested their help in expelling Manuel.
Amr ibn Al-Aas led the campaign, and with the support of the local inhabitants managed to kill Manuel and expel the Byzantines. This then solidified the relationship with the Coptic Christians for centuries to come.
Carole Hillenbrand, in ‘The Crusades: Islamic perspectives’ says: “…Saladin had a private secretary, ibn Sharafi, who was a Copt and Saladins brother al-Adil put a Copt named ibn al-Muqat in charge of the army ministry (diwan al-Jaysh). The appointment of a Christian to a position of such power in war-time and in an area that was military so sensitive tells its own story. Indeed, the loyalties of the Copts in the Ayyubid period seem often to have lain more with the Muslims and with their own local interests than with the Crusaders. This was demonstrated in the Crusade of Damietta in 1218 when the Copts helped to defend the city, and as a consequence suffered greatly at the hands of the Crusaders.”
Undoubtably, the Copts used their ship building and naval skills to help develop and train the Muslim navy for years to come. Hourani says, “The Aphrodito Papyri (c. 710) reveal Copts being conscripted from Upper Egypt for the shipyards of Alexandria and for the annual koursa (raids); they were even being sent to serve on fleets based on Syria.”
One of the blessings Allah (most High) has given human beings is the sailing wind, which enables ships to sail across the globe:
وَمِنْ آيَاتِهِ أَن يُرْسِلَ الرِّيَاحَ مُبَشِّرَاتٍ وَلِيُذِيقَكُم مِّن رَّحْمَتِهِ وَلِتَجْرِيَ الْفُلْكُ بِأَمْرِهِ وَلِتَبْتَغُوا مِن فَضْلِهِ وَلَعَلَّكُمْ تَشْكُرُونَ
“Among His Signs is that He sends the winds bearing good news, to give you a taste of His mercy, and to make the ships run by His command, and to enable you to seek His bounty so that hopefully you will be thankful.” (Ar-Rum, 30:46)
Cloth sails were used to catch the wind and move the ships across the water. During a sea battle, lines of oarsman would row the ships in to position especially if the wind was against them. Square sails were traditionally used for the sea voyage, but the triangular lateen sail was also in use by the Muslim navy for all its ships on the Mediterranean. This sail enabled greater manoeuvrability because it acted like an aeroplane wing, creating high- and low-pressure points which created lift. Hourani says: “Certainly the Greeks took away all existing warships at the time of the first capitulation of Alexandria (641), so that the whole Arab fleet had to be built afresh. It must have consisted of dromones of the regular Byzantine type, fast and light warships with one or two banks of oars; the classical Mediterranean square sails would be used on the voyage but not in the battle.”
All ships were constructed from wood. The most suitable wood available in the region that doesn’t easily rot in the sea is from the Cypress and Cedar trees. This was brought in from Ash-Sham because as Hourani mentions, “The only thing lacking was good timber, in which Egypt is poor; this had to be brought from Syria or elsewhere.” Lebanon is famous for its Cedar trees which is its national symbol appearing on its flag.
The wood was either nailed or stitched together using coir (coconut fibre), a technique used in Oman for constructing the traditional Dhow. Coir was also used to create the ropes and rigging.
The Muslim commanders were known for their high values and were respected not only by their own troops but by their enemies as well. All those who became Admirals were former army generals so they already had well-established command abilities, which were easily transferable to their new naval roles. Battle planning on land was similar to the sea, and the technicalities of sea weather and ship movements could be easily overcome through the use of naval advisors from the Coptic community.
- Abdullah ibn Qays
After the first naval campaign to Cyprus, Mu’aawiya appointed Abdullah ibn Qays as head of the Navy. He led fifty campaigns by sea, some in winter and some in summer, and no one drowned or was seriously injured. He used to pray to Allah to keep him and his marines safe, and not allow any of them to be harmed, and Allah granted that to him.
The high values of this Admiral are shown in the story of his death. One day, dressed as a merchant he took out his boat to scout a Byzantine port. While at the port he was approached by a beggar woman, to whom he gave some sadaqa. This woman then went back to her village and told the men, “Are you looking for Abdullah ibn Qays?” They said: “Where is he?” She said: “In the port.” They said: “O enemy of God, how do you know about Abdullah ibn Qays?” She told them off and said: “You are too incompetent to know about Abdullah ibn Qays.” They rushed to him and attacked him. He fought back, but was martyred. The sailor who was with him, managed to escape and return to the Muslim navy which then launched an attack on the port. When the beggar woman was asked how she knew it was Abdullah ibn Qays she said, “He looked like a merchant, but when I asked him (for charity) he gave like a king, so I knew that he was Abdullah ibn Qays.”
- Sufyan ibn ‘Awf al-Azdi
Sufyan ibn ‘Awf replaced Abdullah ibn Qays. Sufyan was a sahabi, and an experienced army commander who served under Abu Ubaydah ibn al-Jarrah during the conquest of Damascus.
- Busr ibn Abi Artat
Busr was another sahabi who was a commander in the conquest of Ash-Sham and Egypt. He was appointed as head of the navy in Ash-Sham and brought his fleet to join with Abdullah ibn Sa’d for the decisive Dhaat Al-Sawaari.
- Abdullah ibn Saʿd ibn Abi Sarh
Abdullah ibn Sa’d, a sahabi, was appointed by Uthman as governor of Egypt after Amr ibn Al-Aas. He was Admiral of the Fleet during Dhaat Al-Sawaari as will be discussed later.
Abdullah ibn Sa’d became Muslim during the time of the Prophet ﷺ and served as his scribe writing down the revelation. He then apostatised from Islam and returned to Makkah. During the conquest of Makkah all the inhabitants were given amnesty except a small number who had harmed Islam, one of those on the list was Abdullah ibn Sa’d. The Prophet ﷺ said, “Kill them even if you find them clinging to the curtains of the Ka’bah.” However, an interesting turn of events unfolded.
Uthman bin Affan who was the milk brother of Abdullah ibn Sa’d came to the Prophet ﷺ interceding on his behalf. Uthman said, “O Messenger of Allah, accept the bay’a of ‘Abdullah.” He ﷺ raised his head and looked at him three times, refusing each time. After the third time He ﷺ accepted his bay’a. Then the Prophet ﷺ turned to his companions and said: “Was there not among you a wise man who would get up and deal with this man and kill him, when he saw me withholding my hand and refusing to accept his bay’a?” They said: “We did not know, O Messenger of Allah, what you were thinking of; why didn’t you gesture to us with your eyes?” He ﷺ said: “It is not befitting for a Prophet to deceive with his eyes.”
Even though the Prophet ﷺ initially wanted Abdullah ibn Sa’d to be killed, Allah (Most High) had a different plan for him. Abdullah’s contribution to Islam and the Islamic conquests was immense, especially in establishing naval dominance of the Muslim navy in the Mediterranean. There is an important lesson here that the doors of repentance and mercy are always open for people while they still have breath.
The Royal Marines moto is, “By Sea, By Land”, which is a good summary of the skills of a marine, who can fight on ships or on land. The Muslim soldiers were well-experienced, hardened fighters on land so the ships were simply a means of transportation for them. Ship to ship combat, however was something they were not experienced in, and here the Byzantine Marines would have had the upper hand. This disadvantage was overcome in Dhaat Al-Sawaari as will be discussed later.
As with the land battles all of the fighters would have been Muslim and its unlikely any Copts or other dhimmi took on this role.
Hourani poses the question, “Who manned the fleet? We do not know anything about the Syrian squadron. But at least in the Egyptian squadron sailors, rowers, helmsmen etc. were Copts. This is not only probable in itself, but we know that in much later time the Copts continued to be drafted into the navy.”
As mentioned previously the warm relations between Copts and Muslims from the early days would have led to them training the Muslim soldiers and advising the admirals on naval affairs. With the correct motivation someone can learn new skills very quickly. We can see this from the example of Zayd ibn Thabit who was ordered by the Prophet ﷺ to learn Hebrew so he could communicate with the Jewish tribes around Medina. Zayd rose to the task and learnt the language in just 15 days!
There are many transferable skills between fighting on land and on sea. The Arabs used to navigate through the desert plains by use of the stars. This is the same method used at that time for navigating across the seas.
Learning to swim had been encouraged by the Prophet ﷺ himself where he said:
كل شيء ليس فيه ذكر الله فهو لهو ولعب إلا أربع: ملاعبة الرجل امرأته، وتأديب الرجل فرسه، ومشيه بين الغرضين، وتعليم الرجل السباحة
“Every activity that does not contain the remembrance of Allah is futile (lahw) and play (لعب), except for a man doing four things: Walking between two purposeful goals, grooming his horse, playing with his family, or teaching someone to swim.”
Naval weapons of the time were limited, but ship-to-ship combat mainly consisted of catapults for throwing rocks and fire, along with rows of archers firing ordinary and flaming arrows. Ropes with iron hooks were also used to bring down an enemy ship’s mast and sails.
“It was related that ‘Abdullah ibn Qais Al-Fazaari used to attack the people upon the sea in the era of Mu’aawiyah and he used to hurl fire at the enemy. He would burn them and they would burn him, and he said: ‘The affair of the Muslims is still upon that (i.e. they still engage in that type of warfare on the sea).’”
The commander at the Battle of Badr was none other than the noble Prophet ﷺ who was guaranteed victory and help from Allah. Yet despite this Al-Hubaab ibn Al-Mundhir approached the Prophet ﷺ and said, “O Messenger of Allah, concerning this particular spot (where we are making camp), is it a spot concerning which Allah sent down revelation to you, so that we may not advance from it or go behind it? Or is it based on opinion, warfare, and strategy?”
The Prophet ﷺ replied, “Rather, it is opinion, warfare, and strategy.”
Al-Hubaab said, “O Messenger of Allah, then indeed, this is not the place. Rise with the people, O Messenger of Allah, until we reach the water (i.e. well) that is closest to the people (i.e., to the army of the polytheists); there we should make camp and destroy all of the wells that are behind it. Then we should build a basin over it (the well) and fill it with water. Then we will fight the people (the enemy), and we will drink, and they will not drink.”
The Prophet approved of Al-Hubaab’s counsel and led his army to the well that was nearest the enemy. There they made camp and built basins; also, as per the counsel of Al-Hubaab they destroyed all the other wells.
The sahaba clearly understood the spheres of life that are within human beings’ control and those that are not. Within their sphere of control, they would maximise their efforts to achieve the result, all the time making du’a to Allah and getting closer to Him through their good deeds. Military tactics and battle planning was one such area they excelled in. If one plan failed they would not give up but change tactics and deploy a new plan.
At the Battle of Yamama the famous Muslim general Khalid bin Al-Walid, the sword of Allah was in command. The Byzantines thought Khalid was named the Sword of Allah because he used a sword Allah had sent to the Prophet ﷺ, and that his victories were due to this ‘magic sword’. But Khalid ibn Al-Walid was a human being and his battle strategies are studied to this day by western military historians like David Nicolle.
As the battle of Yamama begun, events didn’t go as planned and the Muslims were on the backfoot facing a possible defeat, with enemy soldiers even managing to enter Khalid’s command tent where his wife Laila was staying. Lt-General A.I. Akram describes what had gone wrong:
For this battle Khalid formed his men not in tribal groups, as had been the custom heretofore, but in regiments and wings as required for battle, with tribal contingents intermingled.
Some lack of cohesion was now felt in the Muslim regiments due to the mixture of tribal contingents which were not yet accustomed to fighting side by side.
Khalid saw that forming regiments out of mixed tribal contingents had been a mistake, for the clan feeling was still very strong among the Arabs. It added another pillar of strength to the Islamic zeal and the individual courage and skill which distinguished the Muslim army. In face of the three-to-one superiority of the enemy and the blind, fanatical determination of Musailima’s followers, the absence of tribal loyalty had resulted in a weakening of cohesion in the Muslim regiments.
Khalid corrected this mistake and regrouped the army. He deployed it in the same battle formation with the same commanders, but the soldiers were now formed into clan and tribal units. Thus every man would fight not only for Islam but also for the honour of his clan. There would be healthy rivalry among the clans.
Once the reorganisation was complete, Khalid and his senior commanders went about the regiments. They spoke to the men and strengthened their resolve to punish Musailima for the disgrace that they had suffered. The men swore that if necessary they would fight with their teeth.
Therefore, Khalid changed his battle tactics when he saw they weren’t working and the battle of Yamama became another victory for the Muslims.
Dhaat Al-Sawaari (Battle of the Masts) 654CE
The Byzantines were rapidly losing territory in North Africa and the Mediterranean, so Constantine the son of Heraclius (Constans II) assembled a navy of 500-600 ships and set out to Alexandria to avenge their loses. Ibn Khaldoon says: “Then Ibn Abi’l-Sarh sent out detachments and they subjugated many lands, and they obeyed him and he went back to Egypt. When Ibn Abi’l-Sarh had achieved what he achieved in North Africa and gone back to Egypt, Constantine the son of Heraclius set out to attack Alexandria with six hundred ships.”
Abdullah ibn Sa’d ibn Abi Sarh, head of the Egyptian navy, set off from Alexandria with his ships and met up with Bisr ibn Artah, head of the Ash-Sham navy in order to confront the Byzantine threat. Abdullah ibn Sa’d was in overall command of the Muslim fleet and Constans was in command of the Byzantine fleet, which outnumbered the Muslims nearly 3 to 1. The two fleets faced off against each other, off the coast of Egypt to the west of Alexandria near the city of Marsi Matrooh.
Malik ibn Aws ibn al-Hadathaan, who was one of the naval officers present at the battle, narrates how events unfolded. He said: “I was with them at Dhat Al-Sawari. We met in battle on the sea, and we looked at their ships and had never seen anything like them. The wind was against us – i.e., it was in the favour of the Byzantine ships – so we dropped anchor for a while and they dropped anchor near us.
Then the wind dropped, and we said to the Byzantines: ‘Let us make peace between us and you.’ They said: ‘We will give you that, and in return we want peace.’ The Muslims also said to the Byzantines: ‘If you wish, we will go to the coast and fight there until victory is decreed for one of us, or if you wish, we will fight on the sea.’ Maik ibn Aws said: They all shouted as one: ‘No, on the sea!’
Thus it seemed to us that they were putting their trust in their naval experience and hoping for victory because of their skills and experience at sea, as they were used to it and its climate, so they hoped for a victory at sea, especially since they knew that the Muslims were new in this field.”
Peace wasn’t an option because it would mean the Byzantines submitting to the Islamic authority. Thus with war inevitable, the Byzantines who had been seafarers for centuries and whose ships outnumbered the Muslims nearly 3 to 1, had the upper hand. Similar to Quraysh in the Battle of Badr, they believed their numbers and military superiority would gain them victory. How wrong they were!
The Muslim navy spent the night in dhikr and tahajjud seeking the help of Allah in what seemed an impossible mission. After leading the Muslims at Fajr, Abdullah ibn Sa’d gathered his senior officers for counsel. The Muslim’s strength was in fighting on land in hand-to-hand combat, so they devised a brilliant plan which would play to their advantage.
Abdullah ibn Sa’d ordered his ships to get as close as possible to the Byzantine ships which is why this was called Battle of the Masts due to the closeness of the masts. Some Muslim marines then jumped in the water and tied the ships together creating one large land mass on the sea. The battle then became hand-to-hand combat. Hourani mentions, “The tactics employed made it resemble a land battle, with the opposing vessels locked together and the men fighting with arrows and swords. This method of combat suited the Arab warriors.”
This was a fierce and chaotic battle which as Tabari described, “There was more blood than water in this battle.” The Byzantines tried to isolate the Fleet Admiral’s ship by tying ropes to it and attempting to tow it away. A brave marine named ‘Ilqimah ibn Yazeed al-Ghutayfi sacrificed himself by jumping on the ropes and cutting them, saving Abdullah ibn Sa’d and the command ship.
The Byzantine navy was finally defeated, with its ships destroyed and sailors laying dead in the water. Constans, seeing this destruction fled the battle and ended up in Sicily. When the local population found out about his defeat they said, “Christianity and its men are destroyed! If the Muslims want to invade, they will not find anyone to repel them!” They then killed him. Sicily became one of many Mediterranean islands that came under the authority of the Islamic State after this battle.
The Byzantine historian Theophanes the Confessor said, ‘This battle was a second Yarmouk for the Byzantines.’ This is because the battle of Yarmouk wiped out Byzantine dominance in Ash-Sham, and Dhaat Al-Sawaari wiped out Byzantine dominance in the Mediterranean.
The navy of the Islamic state then began conquering the Mediterranean islands one by one. Cyprus, Crete, Corsica, Sardinia and the Balearic Islands all fell to the Muslims.
Muslim naval dominance of the Mediterranean continued for centuries and Muslim sailors became renowned for their naval expertise. They excelled in cartography and navigation and are credited with enhancing many naval inventions such as the Astrolabe and the lateen sail.
Studying the Islamic conquests is important so we can link ourselves back to our glorious Islamic history and learn valuable lessons from them. There are three key lessons to take from the development of the Muslim navy.
1- Tawakul on Allah and constantly seeking His help through du’a and mandubaat (recommended actions).
2- Maximising the thinking and effort within the sphere that human beings dominate, and not forgetting the famous hadith, اعْقِلْهَا وَتَوَكَّلْ “Tie (the camel) and make tawakul.”
3- The importance of the Islamic method (tareeqa) i.e. the Islamic State, in solving problems by utilising all elements of state and society to achieve a goal. Ash-Sham provided the timber and Egypt provided the ship builders. Both governors cooperated in developing the navy under the overall command of the Caliph Uthman ibn Affan.
By A.K.Newell, Editor of IslamCiv.com
 George Hourani, ‘Arab Seafaring in the Indian Ocean in Ancient and Early Medieval Times,’ Octagon Books, New York 1975, p.57
 David Nicolle, ‘The Muslim Conquest of Syria,’ Osprey Military, 1988, p.7
 Watt, W. Montgomery (1986). “Kuraysh”. The Encyclopaedia of Islam, New Edition, Volume V: Khe–Mahi. Leiden and New York: BRILL. p.434
 Hourani, Op.cit., p.5
 Hourani, Op.cit., p.45
 Sahih al-Bukhari 2877, https://sunnah.com/bukhari/56/93
 Sahih al-Bukhari 2924, https://sunnah.com/bukhari/56/137
 “Al-Madkhal Fil-Aqeedah Wa l-Istraatajiyah Al-‘Askariyah Al-Islaamiyah”, Muhammad Jamaal ud-Deen ‘Ali Mahfouzh: p271-272
 Mashari Al-Ashwaq Ila Masari Al-Ushaaq
 Saeed bin Mansoor in his sunnan with an agreeable chain to Kaab
 Dr Ali Muhammad As-Sallabi, ‘The Biography of Uthman bin Affan,’ Dar us-Salam Publishers, p.273
 al-Tabari, ‘The History of Al-Tabari’, translation of Ta’rikh al-rusul wa’l-muluk, State University of New York Press, Volume XIII, p.129
 Dr Ali Muhammad As-Sallabi, ‘Umar ibn al-Khattab, his life and times,’ International Islamic Publishing House, volume 2, p.30
 Ibid, vol.1, p.409
 Ibid, vol.1, p.390
 As-Sallabi, ‘The Biography of Uthman bin Affan,’ Op.cit., p.273
 Ibid, p.277
 Ibid, p.280
 Hourani, Op.cit., p.57
 Ibn Kathir, ‘Al-Sira al-Nabawiyya,’ The Center for Muslim Contribution to Civilization, Vol.3, p.369
 Dr Ali Muhammad as-Sallabi, ‘Umar ibn al-Khattab his life and times,’ Vol. 2, p. 315
 As-Sallabi, ‘The Biography of Uthman bin Affan,’ Op.cit., p.283
 Carole Hillenbrand, ‘The Crusades: Islamic perspectives,’ p. 414
 Hourani, Op.cit., p.58
 Hourani, Op.cit., p.57
 Hourani, Op.cit., p.57
 As-Sallabi, ‘The Biography of Uthman bin Affan,’ Op.cit., p.277
 Ibid, p.49
 Hourani, Op.cit., p.57
 at-Tirmidhi 2715, https://sunnah.com/tirmidhi/42/28
 Tabarani, 8147
 Sunan Sa’eed Bin Mansoor: 2648, 2/244 and refer to “Al-Mughni”, Ibn Qudaamah: 10/502
 Ibn Ishaq
 Lt-General A.I. Akram, ‘Khalid bin Walid, Sword of Allah,’ Battle of Yarmuk, Chapter 35
 Ibid, Battle of Yamama, Chapter 16
 Tareekh ibn Khuldoon, 2/468
 As-Sallabi, ‘The Biography of Uthman bin Affan,’ Op.cit., p.298
 Hourani, Op.cit., p.58
 Tareekh at-Tabari, 5/293 (Arabic original)
 As-Sallabi, ‘The Biography of Uthman bin Affan,’ Op.cit., p.300
 Ibid, p.299
 Tirmidhi, Book 37, Hadith 2707, https://sunnah.com/urn/727020